Tuesday, 18 February 2014

My Personal Guide To Puns and Wordplay

Start bit


The pun or paronomasia, is a form of word play that suggests two or more meanings, by exploiting multiple meanings of words, or of similar-sounding words, for an intended humorous or rhetorical effect.

That's why you're here.

This is a personal opinion on how to construct half-decent wordplay. Your views may collide in a gentle buffeting manner but these guidelines are those to which I try and abide when writing for greetings cards and tee shirts.

A rule of thumb I use is if you HAVE to break any of the first 4 rules then you are trying too hard and should reconsider the wordplay entirely. Sometimes it's best just to walk away. Or if you are convinced it's a belter, write down the idea and come back to it another time. A fresh coat of eyes is sometimes a good thing; even better than mixing metaphors.

Sometimes simplicity is key for wordplay. In fact, often it is. Punsters (especially in the #1PUN game on twitter) try and go balls-out to deconstruct a massive multi-word statement, or phrase and quite often fail miserably because the setup breaks some or all of the first 4 rules - big time.

I do include an example below where I have bent one of the rules (Rule 5) but you need to be judicious where you can.

Before we start, this is what I consider the worst example of punning:

When my nan turned up the bass on her Dab radio, it knocked her budgie off his perch and gave her an almighty haddock. “Cod almighty!” she shouted “I’ll need a herring aid now!”

This is completely different to wordplay in my opinion and is just substituting similar sounding words around a central theme. It fits the definition with which we opened and is legit for #1PUN but is not really crafting with words.

Note, all examples have been taken from the #1PUN game on Twitter.

Rules


1.  Puns and wordplay shouldn't be forced. They should flow naturally, be conversational, not have too many spikes in them. The ultimate best puns are one liners in my opinion but if that's not possible, try and make the break clean.

2.  Puns and wordplay shouldn't be contrived (deliberately staging a set up which is wholly unbelievable, just for the pay-off)


3.  Or shoe-horned (deliberately staging a set-up just to add the pay-off).


4.  If you have to create a made-up feed line, laboriously laying down synonyms and definitions, just to set up the response in the punchline… it will appear overly contrived and is not good.


Examples

I have five chefs working for me, labelled A to E. Only one of them can make a decent crunchy-topped fruit dessert but that's the way the Cook E crumbles.

The setup is ridiculous, having chefs "labelled" like that just for the pay off. As an aside, "crunchy-topped fruit dessert" could easily have just been pudding for simplicity.

Male bovines living on the banks of the river in Perth have revolted - the Tay bulls have turned.


Clearly ridiculous set up in an effort to get the idiom in as the punchline. An example of starting at the end and working backwards regardless of the finish.


Saw Collins from Genesis this morning who had developed an irrational fear of Trotter from Only Fools & Horses when eating certain cheeses. It was Phil a Del fear.

Where to begin? Utter gubbins in its set up, construction and contrivance.

5.  Avoid if at all possible a repeat of the key punch words in the feedline but not to the detriment of the setup, working with rules 1 to 4

Examples:
I've always been extremely interested in bikes. Does this make me bike-curious?

Bike is used and is replicated again in the punchline. "all forms of two wheeled transport" would have worked much better.

In the following example however, I did break this rule:

Susan Boyle loves a game of snooker but hates you looking at her while she's playing. So remember, a watched Boyle never pots.

But I placed Susan Boyle at the start of the sentence so it was as far away as possible from the eventual punchline. Rule 5 can be bent if there is no other way, but as you can see, it can work.

6. Wordplay that involves heteronyms* will never work.

Examples:

After arguing all day, my wife and I cleared the air with a walk in the park. We hired a boat but ended up rowing.

NO! Having a row with your wife and having a row in a boat are different.

I went to the Reading festival. It was full of books.

NO! NO! NO! Kill it with fire! They are "Redding" and "Reeding" - totally unacceptable!

* A list of heteronyms can be found here 


7.  Similar to heteronyms, puns that rely on a word to be pronounced differently I personally would avoid unless in some way a regional identification can be used in the opening (see rule 8.)

Examples:
I decided to give an award to the best feline rear in my neighbourhood. It was a cat ass trophy

This relies on the reader to pronounce trophy as "troffee" and stress all the wrong syllables and doesn't quite work.

I was thinking of making a sodium joke, but Na.

The chemical symbol for Sodium is Na but it is not pronounced "Nah".. It is N.A. Again, it doesn't quite work for me.

I told my wife cooking wasn't her forté

She said "What's forté?" 

"20 + 20" I replied. 

Forté is pronounced "for-tay", not "for-tee" and there is the whole inflexion thing going on with stressing FOR on forté and TEE on forty. Yes - we can all get it but it's purest form it doesn't quite do it for me.

8.  Remember your audience. Regional and international dialects and slang may not always translate so a locational reference is always useful

Examples:
My Jamaican postman always leaves me wanting. Or another

This would leave a reader scratching his head without the Jamaican reference but of course, it would be bloody hilarious in the pubs of Kingston.

9.    Question and response wordplay shouldn't use an obvious question as the response, just to crowbar in the punchline.

Examples:
Just got back from 'nam!

Vietnam?

No, Cheltenham!

When you say "'nam!" the obvious and assumed location is Vietnam, so why question it? Instead try to phrase the opening so that you don't need the obvious response.

"It was really rough when I was in 'nam"

"I didn't know you were in the army?"

"No man, Cheltenham!"

This classic old chestnut does work because there is clarification needed about the Caribbean destination and the whole pun is not contrived but conversational:

“My wife's gone to the Caribbean on holiday."

“Jamaica?”

“No she decided to go herself.”


Puns that DO work


A few examples of puns that do work because they flow, they sound natural and obey the rules:

Examples:

They were confused when I put lemon sorbet on the cheese biscuit... until I explained that it was just pudding on the Ritz.

@TheActualSteve

Nice natural flow.

My obsession with removing splinters is getting a little bit out of hand

@drofidnas

Simple one liner that flows naturally. Quite rare to get a good one this short actually.

There are lots of different things to do at my local zoo, but the bit where you get to comb the lion's hair is the main event.

@Hugo_Topper

Naturally-paced conversational statement, builds up nicely by introducing "different things" to set up the "main event"

My blind date hasn't turned up at the Whitesnake gig I've bought tickets for. 

So, here I go again on my own.

@TheRealNickKay

A two liner, but necessary. You can almost hear the shrug and the resignation as the punchline begins.

After the Last Supper, Peter stacked chairs, James cleared the table, Thomas settled the bill. Jesus swept.

@markosmond2

Brilliant. The punchline melts into the list of tasks effortlessly.

Do you keep confusing a Scottish engineer for a Time Lord? It's not Watt you know, it's Who you know.

@Albionicman

Just lovely. Simple and natural Q&A pun that needs no additional frills. They are rare but they're out there.

End bit


I hope you can get some use out of this guide. I'm not the pun God, the authority on what's right and what's wrong but these are all rules, pointers, guidelines - call them what you will - that I follow when I write stuff to sell. It may seem picky to a lot of people but writing and crafting good wordplay isn't just having the ability to swap words around willy nilly.

People may argue that deconstructing wordplay takes the shine off it; that it removes part of the fun. I would argue that writing a good flowing piece of wordplay is easily akin to playing a musical instrument, writing a story or drawing a picture. They are all art forms and all have rules that need to be adhered to, to a greater or lesser extent. Once you know the rules and you have learned what sounds and looks good you no longer need to look up chords or consult books on sketching. THEN you can have fun with it.

I'm a technical writer by day and a writer as a hobbyist so I've been in and around words nearly all my life. Knowing my way round the technical aspects of the English language makes it easier for me to write a good pun in my opinion.

People seem to like what I do, so I suppose I must be doing something right.

Cheers.

12 comments:

  1. Very good Chris, and diplomatically put. I'm pleased not to see any of mine in there (which is not to say I haven't broken some or all of those rules - I'm scared to check). I'm compiling my own list of words to think twice about including in pun punchlines - con, ant, shun to start with - just because they're often the result of contravening one of the rules. And a pet hate - the prevalence of thyme/time puns. One thing I don't think you did mention was that there should be some sense and logic to the pun. You could have a very good pun which is completely undermined by being illogical.

    Just a couple of picky points. Quite a lot of people pronounce often as '"offen"; whereas I don't think 'putting' as 'pudding' is common.

    And - I loved the splinter pun yesterday.

    Simon (Nuncio)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Simon.
      And if one of yours was in there would you have been as annoyed as those whose were?!

      Delete
    2. No, I don't think so. You said up front that it's your personal opinion, and the rules are those you apply to your own creations, so no one should argue with that, even if they're more relaxed themselves. As I said, I've broken several of those rules. I don't think I'd be quite as prescriptive on the pronunciation issue as you are. (Maybe there's a leeway area between 100% exact pronunciation match and outright difference which I'd call 'pununciation'.) But people can be defensive about their creations. In my reply I was going to include some examples of puns which don't make logical sense which were posted in yesterday's #1pun but wimped out for that reason - I'm just not as honest as you.

      I didn't notice that people had been annoyed by your piece, though I was half expecting to be annoyed myself by 'Leave it out - it's just a bit of fun' type replies.

      Delete
    3. Thanks blob. With hindsight, I should have thought up some stuff from scratch then no one would have been annoyed. The annoyance I think came from people thinking "who are you to say my stuff is shit according to YOUR rules? Who are you anyway?" but that was a misinterpretation.

      Nothing in the ones I have quoted couldn't be rewritten anyway which was half the point of the post and is half the point of the 1PUN games - to foster creative punning.

      Delete
  2. Very helpful! Thank you! And you didn't use any of my #1PUNs as a bad example!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Would agree with most points Chris. I see criticism of one of my own there which I actually agree with (erm....I was in a rush, I was young, I needed the money) although I don't think the suggested alternative works either. No matter, I think the rules are really good. One thing that people might consider though is that #1PUN also draws people from outside the UK where vernacular pronunciations are sometimes different. I'm thinking of the 'forte' one mentioned above. You might not know this but 'tea' is pronounced 'tay' in certain parts of Ireland (and thus parts of London and elsewhere) so the forte one might strike quite a funny chord with some (btw - that wasn't my pun, it was too good ;-)). Anyway, there you go. Opinions eh! Good blog though and great punning.

    Walter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Walter. I try to be helpful and get shafted for it. I'm glad some can see my intent - it wasn't a finger pointing or name calling exercise, far from it.

      Delete
  4. I fear you may have left yourself open to a bit of a backlash on this, that said I tend to follow similar guides myself and will often rewrite a pun befofe submitting it. As a lover of words, grammar, punctuation and wordplay and being somewhat of a pedant, I understand a lot of what you say and agree with most of it. I think those who have had their puns criticised may not be overly pleased about it, but some of your remarks are justified. I suspect @juan__pun probably applies very similar rules to the judging. One thing though: sometimes, as cringe-worthy as a pun may be, is it not better for someone to break 'the rules' and play, than worry about it and not? My opinion mate.

    Disappointed you didn't use my Huge Profit joke as a good example. I rewrote that bastard loads of times! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This has got out of hand surprisingly quickly. This guide has been written for ages now and I use it to remind myself how to write. A couple of the punners yesterday, when I mentioned I had one written, asked if they could see it. Now you all have. I picked a few examples of puns that didn't fit the rule but they were not intended to be slagged off - I don't know who wrote what, as I've been cutting and pasting them in at random - I could search for the users I suppose but by offering anonymity I'm not singling people out either.

      In the same way you offer a draft letter or document for comment, everything you post is free for comment.

      Ok, in terms of 1PUN, maybe play is what it's about but as I've said before, I sell my jokes to a few greeting cards companies and have honed my writing to be saleable. 90% of 1PUN entries wouldn't fly.

      If the above has offended in any way then I'm deeply sorry. I have lots of good friends on twitter, I'd hardly set out to be deliberately inflammatory to them.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is a great little guide based upon your experience. If I had been included I wouldn't have taken offence - it must be seen as a means of self improvement. The only way you improve at anything is through research and practice. I teach people how to write, create and present conference and meeting presentations (which I feel has much in common with stand up). Many of your sorts of rules sort of apply to what I do. I'm reading several books on the technical side of joke writing to improve the way that I can help others. This is extremely useful and I thank you for it!

    Dom
    @GuitaristDom

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very useful guide, Chris. Cheers. Can I give you an example from our mutual buddy, Bury Bob? I reckon it's a classic:

    Had to get my pet crab declawed recently and it was quite emotional.
    I've had him since he was a nipper.

    Hehe

    ReplyDelete